This happens a lot, which is rather nice, actually. I forget things I've written. I'll be reminded if a reader tells me, or a search for something else turns up a bit of my history. That happened now, as I was researching something slightly related, and found one of my old columns. From 2007, which is an eternity in the newspaper world. But I just reread this, and I liked it. I like her spunk. Mine. It's about daycare. If you have no interest, you can go read tango stuff again or wait until tomorrow when I'll blog for real. After I paint my bathroom again, because I used the wrong paint today and have to do it again. I'll explain tomorrow.
One of my columns on daycare in Canada. And where I think the shame lies.
I used to work in a business that created and sold things. The
catch-all word "widget" fits well, so we'll use that. We sold widgets.
Some of the widgets we sold were bigger than others, some were
definitely more fun to sell, and some were pretty boring but at least we
made money from them – and the focus, after all, was to make a profit.
When
my son decided he wanted to sponsor a child in a developing nation, the
very first thing I set out to learn was how much of my son's paper
route money would actually go to the well-being of the sponsored child. I
wanted to make sure that, after reasonable administration costs, our
Rwandan widget benefited from the cash. The focus after all, shouldn't
be to make a profit.
The nature of any economy insists that if
money is spent, some of it will go to places you didn't intend or
realize. There are extremes; some corrupt foreign government may pocket
all international aid, which isn't what I intended with my disaster
relief donation, or my son may use his allowance to buy firecrackers.
Either way, the control freaks among us often find it tough.
If
there is one issue, however, where societies need to step off the
profit-powered money wheel, it is child care. Australian Eddy Groves has
specifically tapped into countries with government daycare subsidies,
and his cost-cutting measures have led to ongoing political and legal
battles regarding substandard care and employee treatment.
He has
figured out how to wring every last nickel out of the management and
care of little Australian ankle-biters. He has turned children into
widgets, and can now tally his profits from his yacht.
Eddy has
announced plans to come to Canada. The opposition parties in this
country are fighting to get Bill C-303 passed to maintain quality care
for our children. The Conservatives will probably show up for Fast
Eddy's first ribbon cutting. Not their kids going in there.
Have
you ever shopped at one of those cavernous warehouse places that promise
"we pass the savings on to you"? Have you pushed down box-crowded
aisles, picked through busted up packaging, scoured best-before dates to
avoid hazardous conditions?
Should any child, even if he's not
yours, be subjected to similar conditions? When the profit margins are
narrow, those seeking profit will scrape for every dime. Profit margins
on decent, licensed child care are already non-existent. Workers are
paid poorly, government standards are blessedly high, and parents are
already squeezed in the middle. For someone to come in and start
skimming money from the process means only one thing: the kids will
suffer.
Let me be perfectly clear: I do not subscribe to the
sterile thinking of some who embrace an ideology about children that
includes the words "you had 'em, you raise 'em."
Any animal that
forms herds – and that would be us – protects the young. All of them.
Some parents are better than others, but in a resource-rich society like
ours there is no reason all children can't have a decent shot at
success.
And forget basking in the warmth of knowing that your
own kids are okay. They are going to go out in the world and form
relationships with kids who perhaps weren't raised with the same
strengths. Yep, the offspring of someone who didn't get to dip into the
horn of plenty may be calling you Grandpa or Grandma.
Where is
the moral outrage that we have become a community that would rather
incarcerate a 16-year-old than teach a 3-year-old? How backassed has our
thinking become?
Some kids need daycare; some kids need
after-school care; some kids don't require either outside of the home.
Regardless of the composition, every one of those children needs a safe,
educational experience.
Where do the broken widgets go?
Labels: canada, daycare, for profit daycare, get a grip